Top SEO sites provided "Have had" keyword
Keyword Suggestion
Related websites
present perfect - When is it necessary to use "have had"?
WEBFeb 10, 2020 — 111. "have had" is using the verb have in the present perfect tense. Consider the present tense sentence: I have a lot of homework. This means that I have a lot of homework now. On the other hand, we use the present perfect tense to describe an event from the past that has some connection to the present. Compare the following two …
English.stackexchange.comWhen do we use “had had” and “have had”? [duplicate]
WEB14. There's no special magic with " had had ", they don't really go together as a pair anymore than " had wanted " go together. So don't worry so much about how to use " had had " as a unit of grammar, they will come together naturally when you want to express the verb ' to have ' in the past perfect. Let's consider a different verb for a
English.stackexchange.comWhat is the difference between "have had" and "had"?
WEBFeb 12, 2014 — I have had letters delivered to me in the last week. The first (marked with an asterisk) is incorrect because it defines a specific time, and the form does not work with a specific time. It is used to describe experiences one has had in the past (and that hence influence the experience with which you speak today), changes over time, uncompleted …
English.stackexchange.com"Have had" versus "had" - English Language Learners Stack …
WEBHere is my example from my other question: People who have had their belongings taken will turn into miserable people. Here are the things I seem to have gotten from StoneyB's answers: have had is used for one-time occurrences, but had can be used for such occurrences as well. Have or simple present is used for something more habitual.
Ell.stackexchange.comfuture perfect - Please explain "will have had" - English Language
WEBApr 11, 2014 — 4. Okay, I'll take this context in mind and try to explain building a story. Will have had simply means that in the future, you'll finish/have something in past! If that makes you confused, let me simplify. Once I finish this pancake I will have had five pancakes. It's 5 o'clock in the evening.
Ell.stackexchange.comIs 'had have + past participle' a correct grammatical form?
WEBNov 27, 2015 — The had have construction in an if-clause is an example of what is commonly called the double perfect.This extract from grammar.about.com cites The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language's discussion of the usage, which it calls non-standard:
English.stackexchange.comWhat is the difference between "had had to" and "have had to"?
WEBNov 4, 2015 — The past participle of HAVE is had, so these constructions end with had to. In have had to the auxiliary is cast in the present-tense form, which is have with a first-person subject, so this is a present perfect. In had had to the auxiliary is cast in the past-tense form, which is always had, so this is a past perfect. Examples of the
Ell.stackexchange.comUse of "could have had" "would have had" "had had" "has/have …
WEBIn my life I have had many good dinners. Adding "could" or "would" to this is no different from other uses of could (to describe potential) or would (to describe a hypothetical). He would have had that car since he was a teenager, if he hadn't driven it into the lake last week. In my life I could have had many good dinners, if I was a better cook.
Ell.stackexchange.comgrammar - Use of "have had" , "had had", "has had" - English …
WEB1. You have to use "had had" if something has been done long back, not recently. But if something has been done recently, then you can use "have had" or "has had" depending on the pronoun. For example, I have had a good lunch this afternoon. He has had his bike repaired last month. More on the usage, you can refer the below link.
English.stackexchange.com"Would have" or "would had" - use of tenses in a sentence
WEBMar 28, 2017 — Usually, would have suggests a bad feeling about the past. Could have, would have, and should have are sometimes called “modals of lost opportunities”. Both your sentences are incorrect (never use has or had to form a past modal): When talking about something that didn’t happen in the past, many English speakers use the conditional
Ell.stackexchange.com